tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.comments2023-07-25T19:09:04.784+05:30India Legal ViewsRohit Sharmahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13550647235703571286noreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-53376252976400364122015-09-22T13:13:41.306+05:302015-09-22T13:13:41.306+05:30Hi,
Thanks for sharing this post with us. It'...Hi,<br /><br />Thanks for sharing this post with us. It's really an amazing post. Keep posting the good work in future too.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://supremecourtlawyeropinion.blogspot.in/" rel="nofollow">Supreme Court Advocate</a>Richahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00255902868136657410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-40111507077765938402015-04-06T12:35:22.288+05:302015-04-06T12:35:22.288+05:30Indian Legal System: What are some of the most int...Indian Legal System: What are some of the most interesting court cases of India..<a href="http://www.theindianlawyer.in/supreme-court-litigation/" rel="nofollow">Supreme Court Litigation Lawyer Delhi<br /></a><br />sekharroynihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01543653143809034091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-57498751353273651162015-01-29T12:59:49.395+05:302015-01-29T12:59:49.395+05:30Joint Venture is a common form of doing business i...Joint Venture is a common form of doing business in India.<br /><a href="http://www.theindianlawyer.in/joint-ventures-in-india/" rel="nofollow">Joint Venture Lawyer Delhi<br /></a><br />sekharroynihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01543653143809034091noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-10921480261199064592014-09-29T13:16:06.760+05:302014-09-29T13:16:06.760+05:30Thanx for sharing information. This blog is very i...Thanx for sharing information. This blog is very informative. and I would like to see some more blogs on this topic.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.powershow.com/view0/67484b-MDRkO/Supreme_Court_Advocate_in_India_powerpoint_ppt_presentation" rel="nofollow">Supreme Court Advocate</a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13189502753453570957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-85100264808842201552014-06-15T11:54:01.718+05:302014-06-15T11:54:01.718+05:30The SC judges have too much ego and become accusto...The SC judges have too much ego and become accustomed to pomp and ceremonies that they will never agree to sit in a bench in some other part of the country. The SC judges posted other than delhi will view it as a punishment posting. Pseudo - Judges mindset. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-55549618339772982042013-11-25T21:07:32.500+05:302013-11-25T21:07:32.500+05:30NO NEW POST?NO NEW POST?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-10113894876098333212013-11-25T21:06:43.009+05:302013-11-25T21:06:43.009+05:30why no new post? why no new post? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-14527277438871133502013-04-01T08:20:14.389+05:302013-04-01T08:20:14.389+05:30AOR mix up with the other side and pass on vital i...AOR mix up with the other side and pass on vital information thus harming case in most instances, They are an evil addition to the Justice system in Supreme court. A person seeking justice have to pay double fee one to his Good lawyer and another to the AOR... Thus making filing a case in supreme court very costly for the client, hence justice is Kinda denied in the process...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10326268955483152092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-45204238555998865052010-10-16T23:27:25.368+05:302010-10-16T23:27:25.368+05:30The crux of whole issue is that the condition of h...The crux of whole issue is that the condition of having an office of AOR within a radis of 5km.which is not possible for all advocates across the country.At the same time it can not be expected of litigants to believe AORs at Delhi for pleading their cases. obviously known diety is better than unknown one" <br />the system of AOR and the condition was more relevant in during corresponding time tody serving notice etc.in any corner of country is no more a problem. A dedicated website can be created for resolving this issue by Hon. supreme court itself and lawers from all over the country can be allowed to function as AORs<br />There is one more way to minimise this problem and that is by having extended arms of Hon. supreme courts in metros/big cities. Any ways Govt. is decentralising in all areas including exercise of power. It will be like benches in places other than in Delhi.Hopefully this issue will end with some appreciable solutionAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-26457535223995782832010-08-20T23:28:41.420+05:302010-08-20T23:28:41.420+05:30The issue is of the exorbitant amounts the Advocat...The issue is of the exorbitant amounts the Advocates on Record cahrge for filing a cas from the client.<br /><br />They do not even see the case or what it is about. The system might suit the Court; but it is against the constitution.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-5479199953066922112010-07-01T21:12:57.170+05:302010-07-01T21:12:57.170+05:30can u guide for aor exam.what is the syllabus etc....can u guide for aor exam.what is the syllabus etc.......Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11665789501677503472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-15629587069515844722010-03-27T09:36:30.360+05:302010-03-27T09:36:30.360+05:30Thanks for the post. AoR exams are not restricted ...Thanks for the post. AoR exams are not restricted to Supreme Court procedures only. It includes papers on Drafting, Leading Cases, Professional Ethics, Accounts as well. Whatever the present system has turned out to be, considering the above subjects being part of AoR exams, mere "notice-serving" was definitely not the only purpose of creating the AOR group.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-46606857886690760842010-03-26T16:45:09.416+05:302010-03-26T16:45:09.416+05:30Is there any guide / book available for preparatio...Is there any guide / book available for preparation of aor exam ? Where can I get such a guide / book ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-40403884921457813632010-01-07T13:04:28.413+05:302010-01-07T13:04:28.413+05:30Thank you Bhagwad. Yes, it will be interesting.Thank you Bhagwad. Yes, it will be interesting.Rohit Sharmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13550647235703571286noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-49375824912647766732010-01-07T08:07:06.515+05:302010-01-07T08:07:06.515+05:30Quite a decent analysis. The question of constitut...Quite a decent analysis. The question of constitutional morality is indeed the cornerstone of the judgement. It'll be interesting to see if the principle is consistently applied to other rulings of the courts.Bhagwad Jal Parkhttp://www.bhagwad.com/blognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-41414853544033869312009-11-28T14:30:17.858+05:302009-11-28T14:30:17.858+05:30Thank you for the post. I think AoR exams are a us...Thank you for the post. I think AoR exams are a useful way of ensuring that the advocate is aware of the filing procedures and requirements of the Supreme Court. This is necessary for outside counsel, who themselves are aware of procedures only in their own High Court. Judges hear non AoRs because the Advocates Act permits any Advocate registered with a Bar Council to plead in the High Court. Therefore, they cannot be restricted to AoRs. <br /><br />Please leave your name from the next time.Rohit Sharmanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-86715049613261114022009-11-27T00:12:17.647+05:302009-11-27T00:12:17.647+05:30very nice. If advocate on record system is useful...very nice. If advocate on record system is useful only for the purpose of serving notice why have aor exam? what purpose does it serve? If advocates on record are responsible for appearance, why do the judges hear non aors?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-58414543397171467362009-11-25T06:43:22.508+05:302009-11-25T06:43:22.508+05:30Thanks Rohit:
1. Just like a disease is better co...Thanks Rohit:<br /><br />1. Just like a disease is better controlled when the doctor and the patient share the same perspective, law is best applied when the legal experts and common public think alike. This convergence is best achieved by free and fair interaction. Though the judgments are public, public cannot comment on them easily for fear of contempt of court and lack of technology. So, my suggestion was for the honourable courts to post the judgments in web 2.0 technologies like this one, where readers like me can comment on them as I'm doing now.<br /><br />2. Yes, I guessed. My hope was that this number will or should drastically go down by legislation or practice when CC cases are handled by a legislative sub-committee. I read about the contempt cases on SC Advocate Prashant Bhushan and one other HC advocate in APHC and felt they were unfortunate happenings. Anyway, my 2 cents :)Dr. Vishnu S. Pendyalahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00478229776404445375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-21227414425611515122009-11-24T11:41:18.828+05:302009-11-24T11:41:18.828+05:30Thanks for the post Vishnu.
1. Judgments of the Su...Thanks for the post Vishnu.<br />1. Judgments of the Supreme Court are already public. They are also openly commented upon in legal journals. This has been the practice forever. <br /><br />2. DO you know how many contempt of court cases are listed every day?? Each High Court has a special judge sitting only for contempt cases, who has at least 100 cases listed each day. You think the legislature could handle that?Rohit Sharmanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-68810999730301122302009-11-24T07:04:55.418+05:302009-11-24T07:04:55.418+05:30Another aspect that has been debated in the recent...Another aspect that has been debated in the recent times is the use of contempt of court act, by the Honourable courts. It is an established principle of civility that one cannot judge and award punishment for injury caused to self. That is, one cannot be a victim and a judge simultaneously for the same incident. The entire concept of judiciary seems to be based on this principle. In the case of “contempt of court,” the victim is the judiciary. So, it may not be appropriate for judiciary to adjudicate the case. The law should be changed so that on the rarest of the rare occasions when “contempt of court” cases arise, they should be referred to the Parliament or the Executive. The adjudication can still be done by professionals drawn from the legal community, but reporting to the Executive or the Parliament. This body of legal professionals which does not report to the judiciary should also be vested with the power to entertain any complaints against the judiciary. Just like a victim cannot adjudicate injury done to him, so also an accused, in this case, the judiciary, cannot adjudicate complaints against himself.<br /><br /> A democracy will not be effective when freedom of speech is scuttled and there is no transparency in government transactions. Parliament proceedings are now widely available to the public on the internet, TV, etc and are freely debated. Judiciary should similarly make all of their judgments open to the public and allow public to freely comment on them. Thanks to the technology, the Internet is now writable. Technology allows any reader to post comments right underneath what they read on the Internet. So, judiciary can use this technology to gain confidence of the public. If the inability of the honourable judges to call for a press conference to defend criticism is the chief holding factor to implement this, this restriction can be removed. In fact, we often are seeing the Honourable judges making statements to the press on various occasions. So, the justification that judges cannot call for press conferences does not seem to hold water.Dr. Vishnu S. Pendyalahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00478229776404445375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-30812812549284037592009-07-04T01:06:28.609+05:302009-07-04T01:06:28.609+05:30thats pure BS all right.. though it may be argued ...thats pure BS all right.. though it may be argued that SB Sinha's Judgment really means that the judgment is applicable all throughout india inter se between the parties.. because Article 226(2) is meant for that purpose.. but on the other hand.. a judgment on constitutionality of a statute has to be a judgment in rem...Rohit Sharmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13550647235703571286noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-24197853094399797632009-07-03T15:40:49.681+05:302009-07-03T15:40:49.681+05:30So what do you think? Someone I know said "ap...So what do you think? Someone I know said "applicable throughout India but binding only in Delhi", which sounds like fresh, pure bullshit.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04380949898047556944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-85493281995338534612009-06-25T12:52:15.132+05:302009-06-25T12:52:15.132+05:30This blog sucks! Its worse than that stupid cricke...This blog sucks! Its worse than that stupid cricket blog you post comments on.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04380949898047556944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-54129741882876953872009-06-03T18:13:56.361+05:302009-06-03T18:13:56.361+05:30and then it died again.and then it died again.Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12488382540458595578noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-802514110232909881.post-60675177447082405252009-05-28T10:55:32.369+05:302009-05-28T10:55:32.369+05:30Still Waiting...Still Waiting...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com